General Mac OS X Discussion General Apple and Mac OS X Discussion

View Poll Results:
0 0%
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#1) Old
Junior Member
 
Posts: 17
Join Date: Aug 2009
Question Snow Leopard Performance Poll - 09-23-2009, 01:44 PM

Hello everyone,

I recently did a clean install of Snow Leopard on a Mini 10v with 2GB ram and a 120GB HD using Netbook Maker/Netbook Installer v.8.2. Everything seems to be working as far as the install goes, but the performance of Snow Leopard as compared to Leopard is lacking. With my previous Leopard install everything seemed to be more responsive. Now, with Snow Leopard, there seems to be a slight delay with everything, i.e. dock animation, opening/closing windows, bootup, internet browsing. The Activity Monitor does not show any processes taking up all the resources. Is anyone else experiencing this performance decrease with Snow Leopard? Are there any suggestions on what to look for that might be causing this performance decrease? If you've experienced an increase in performance with Snow Leopard, can you describe your configuration?

Thanks for the input!

Dave
Reply With Quote
  (#2) Old
gbk gbk is offline
Junior Member
 
Posts: 22
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New York
Default 09-23-2009, 02:18 PM

By know means do I have any idea what I'm talking about from a technical aspect, but I think repairing permissions and rerunning NBI to regenerate the dsdt.aml helps. Run geekbench and see how your scores compare before and after.
Reply With Quote
  (#3) Old
Junior Member
 
Posts: 9
Join Date: Sep 2009
Default 09-23-2009, 03:11 PM

Although I didn't run geekbench, I timed the bootup and shutdown time. They are darn good. 30 sec for bootup and 5 sec for shutdown. Snow leopard is running on 8GB SSD, 1GB RAM, Vostro A90 with 3GB free space (as reported by Snow Leopard.. I know they changed the calculation) The only other software I have installed so far is yahoo messenger and TV viewer plugin for itunes. Previously my bootup time were longer at about 1.5 min. Yes disk space was cramped too and I was running 10.5.4. Also I was running on MBR partition. I tested to make sure that QE/CI is enabled (this doesn't show up in System Profile anymore). Checked couple of HD videos and normal videos at youtune and Hulu. The HD videos were getting buffered because of my network connection, 800Kbps DSL and that too with wireless. Also checked that flash had set HW Acceleration for the videos.
Reply With Quote
  (#4) Old
Super Moderator
 
bmcclure937's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,420
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: United States
Send a message via AIM to bmcclure937
Default 09-23-2009, 03:17 PM

You may also want to specify between Mini 10v and Mini 9. Snow Leopard improved the boot time on the Mini 9 but it made it worse on the 10v.

Not quite sure why...


 Mini 10v  | 2Gb RAM | 320 Gb HDD | Ubuntu 10.04 | OSX 10.6.3 | NBI .8.4RC1 | Chameleon Bullet Theme | BIOS A05 | USB Wake : OFF | USB Legacy : ON | No BlueTooth
Meklort's Blog | NBI Google Code Page | osx.mechdrew.com -- the best OSX installation guides
Reply With Quote
  (#5) Old
Junior Member
 
Posts: 17
Join Date: Aug 2009
Default 09-23-2009, 05:54 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by gbk View Post
By know means do I have any idea what I'm talking about from a technical aspect, but I think repairing permissions and rerunning NBI to regenerate the dsdt.aml helps. Run geekbench and see how your scores compare before and after.
So I repaired the permissions and re-generated the dsdt.aml file. I did the geekbench test before and after. I got an 985 before and a 990 after. The funny thing is that according to the benchmarks on the geekbench site, I have the 2nd highest score for a Mini 10v.

Here is the report for my last run, and here are the results for the 10v.

gbk, what kind of results do you get from geekbench? Or anyone else for that matter.

As an aside, for some reason, I can't open any image file in iPhoto or Preview (so far). I can see the thumbnails, but when I attempt to open the full view, I get the following in my Console:

9/23/09 1:02:50 PM Preview[211] invalid pixel format
9/23/09 1:02:50 PM Preview[211] invalid context

I'm wondering if that is a symptom of a larger problem? Or more specifically, the cause of the decreased performance. But, I digress and will start a new post for that one.
Reply With Quote
  (#6) Old
Senior Member
 
Posts: 153
Join Date: Sep 2009
Default 09-23-2009, 06:31 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by bmcclure937 View Post
You may also want to specify between Mini 10v and Mini 9. Snow Leopard improved the boot time on the Mini 9 but it made it worse on the 10v.

Not quite sure why...
The slow booting is obviously a problem which occures with the Mini10v.
I made a screenshot of the boot-screen. Perhaps this could help, maybe meklort has an idea.

I think at this point is a short delay

launchctl: Please convert the following to launced /etc/match_init.d/dashboardadvidsoryd.plist


here at this point is a long delay:

Warning - com.apple.driver.InternalModemSupport declared no kknerel dependencies; using com.apple.kernel.6.0.


After that, here is a delay, too:

AirPort: RSN handshake complete on en1

I hope that meklort can fix this issue, it is very annoying that booting 10.6.1 takes much longer than 10.5.8
Attached Thumbnails
boot.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  (#7) Old
Senior Member
 
Posts: 136
Join Date: Apr 2009
Default 09-23-2009, 09:09 PM

Booting and shutdown are faster on my 2GB Mini 9. Performance in general is about the same.


---
Dell Mini 9, 2GB RAM, 32GB SuperTalent SSD, no camera, Dell OEM Bluetooth
Running OS X 10.6.2, 100% functional thanks to 0.8.3 Final.
Reply With Quote
  (#8) Old
Member
 
Posts: 65
Join Date: Aug 2009
Default 09-23-2009, 09:20 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by bmcclure937 View Post
You may also want to specify between Mini 10v and Mini 9. Snow Leopard improved the boot time on the Mini 9 but it made it worse on the 10v.

Not quite sure why...
Anyone have any ideas on why this is going on with the mini10v?


Dell Mini 10v | OS X 10.6.2 | NetbookInstaller .8.3RC5 | BIOS Version A05 | 120GB HD | No BT | 2 Gigs Ram
Reply With Quote
  (#9) Old
Member
 
Posts: 36
Join Date: Sep 2009
Default 09-25-2009, 03:28 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubun View Post
Although I didn't run geekbench, I timed the bootup and shutdown time. They are darn good. 30 sec for bootup and 5 sec for shutdown. Snow leopard is running on 8GB SSD, 1GB RAM, Vostro A90 with 3GB free space (as reported by Snow Leopard.. I know they changed the calculation) The only other software I have installed so far is yahoo messenger and TV viewer plugin for itunes. Previously my bootup time were longer at about 1.5 min. Yes disk space was cramped too and I was running 10.5.4. Also I was running on MBR partition. I tested to make sure that QE/CI is enabled (this doesn't show up in System Profile anymore). Checked couple of HD videos and normal videos at youtune and Hulu. The HD videos were getting buffered because of my network connection, 800Kbps DSL and that too with wireless. Also checked that flash had set HW Acceleration for the videos.
how has your experience been with SL on Vostro A90?
Reply With Quote
  (#10) Old
Junior Member
 
Posts: 8
Join Date: Jun 2009
Default Great on Mini 9 - 09-25-2009, 05:46 PM

I just did an upgrade from Leopard on my Mini 9 and everything's working nearly perfectly. The only thing I've noticed is that the battery menu shows a "Service Battery" warning but nothing seems to be wrong with it. Other than that, I haven't noticed anything wrong.

When I did the upgrade, I went through the process of upgrading from a USB drive. When it was done it restarted and had a kernel panic. I rebooted to the USB drive again, went into utilities and ran the netbook installer and then restarted again and everything works great. I then did software update to update itunes to 9 and os x to 10.6.1. Did this and restarted. Still working excellently.

I think the upgrade freed up a little over 2GB from Leopard. I'm currently showing nearly 6GB free on my 16GB SSD. This is after monolingual and xslimmer and I don't have too many additional applications or anything, so I don't know if this is considerably good or bad, but it's good to me.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
performance, snow leopard

« Ehh, weird problem... | Help! Upgraded to SL and cannot boot in a dual-boot Win7/OSX system! »
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Copyright © 2008-2011 MyDellMini.com.