| ||||||||
Dell Mini 9 Hardware Issues / Problems Inform everyone on any issues or problems with your Dell Mini 9 hardware.
|
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
(#1)
|
| Member Posts: 42 Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia, Europe | At the bottom of the post there are two or three specific questions, but for the beginning let's start (I'll try to be as short as possible) with the whole story... In May last year I got myself a brand new Dell Mini 9 netbook (with Intel Atom N270 CPU and 8 GB SSD). And even though I was taking a good care of the SSD (actually, I was almost paranoid about/obsessed with it, meaning that for instance I was trying to avoid as much unnecessary disk accesses/writes as possible; e.g. I've rather used a USB key as a location for Shared folders, I haven't installed many additional programs, and especially not huge ones etc.), especially compare to my friend who has the same type of SSD (and who carelessly installs almost everything that he crosses, and also in general he puts much more stress to his - the same Dell Mini 9 - netbook, by for example viewing online TV on it etc.), it died no more than 1 year later, while in friend's case his SSD now works normally for more than 2 years! Now, the computer was still under warranty so I got a new one for free, but that doesn't matter much (if that can/might/will happen again) and it's beside the point here. I mean, I am interested in general: is there anything else (beside not stressing it unnecessarily) that I could do so that I would have a better chance for this new SSD of mine to last longer? As first, I noticed that by default it's set to have no pagefile (i.e. "No paging file" under System - Performance - Advanced), which I later changed to 512 MB initial and 1024 MB maximal size (since I remember reading on Ars Technica forum that some apps require pagefile even if the machine has plenty of RAM), and so I am asking this again: maybe this is actually a good thing (a sort of a precaution measure)? Secondly, since one of the members on Ars Technica forum said that defragging will make SSDs wear out faster, I am wondering: maybe this is also the reason why Dell's technicians (or whoever initially setup my system) disabled the Task Scheduler service on my Dell Mini 9 netbook (the boot-file placement optimization is a part of Prefetching, which requires/runs through Task Scheduler)?! Thanks for any advice, opinion, tip, or whatever! ---------- Post added at 03:05 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:51 AM ---------- Oh and one more thing/question: do you think that (as a precaution measure) I should turn-off write caching feature (it is on by default) as I am used to do in case of common disk-drives? You see, the main reason that I am used to always disable it on all my new Windows XP installations (and also on my friends' computers) is that I've read somewhere that experiencing a power outage or a system freeze/restart can not only cause data loss/corruption (which might not matter that much), but can also result in hard-disk's failure. |
| | |
(#2)
|
(#3)
|
| Member Posts: 42 Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia, Europe | Quote:
![]() Quote:
Isn't what you're describing the so-called file caching (i.e. file cache), for which I know for sure that it's "happening" in (and it takes/occupies otherwise unused) RAM? And thanks for the quick reply holmes! | ||
| | |
(#4)
|
(#5)
|
| Junior Member Posts: 4 Join Date: Jul 2010 | Actually it did, though I can't recall if it only defragged prefetch files or the whole disk. It's a little tricky to find info about it, but here's some from the XP embedded site: Disabling Disk Defragmentation You can access the setting with the "Optimize disk when idle" setting in TweakUI. |
| | |
(#6)
|
(#7)
|
(#8)
|
(#9)
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| dell mini 9, life span, pagefile, ssd |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Copyright © 2008-2011 MyDellMini.com.










Linear Mode