Dell Mini 10v Forum for all discussions and support on the Dell Mini 1011, also known as the Mini 10v. If your question is regarding Mac OS X, please use the Mini 10v Mac OS X forum.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#1) Old
Senior Member
 
formerglory's Avatar
 
Posts: 115
Join Date: Feb 2009
Post Some MATLAB benchmarks for the 10v - 02-21-2010, 06:58 AM

So, my girlfriend just recently got a Mini 10v for classes, and I spent several hours setting up Win7/Mac OS on it for her. It's a wonderful machine, and I was going to get one to replace my Mini 9, but got an Acer instead. (I'm probably going to come back to the 10v though, for OS X). I do a lot of coding/simulation in MATLAB (engineering student), so I thought I'd benchmark her Mini against my Acer 1410 and my quad-core desktop. I'm posting these here just to give people who are interested in scientific computing and the Mini 10v.

The program I ran is a GPS app that I wrote for my global nav systems class. In layman terms, it takes in some nav data, processes it, and calculates your position/coordinates.

Mini 10v, Atom N280, running W7 Pro x32, 2GB of RAM, stock 160GB HDD, MATLAB R2007b:
188.76 seconds (avg of three runs)

Acer 1410, Celeron SU2300 1.3 GHz dual-core ULV, W7 Pro x32, 2GB RAM, stock 160GB HDD, MATLAB R2007b:
100.32 seconds (avg of 3 runs)

Intel Q9400 2.6 GHz quad-core desktop, W7 Pro x64, 7GB of RAM, 640GB WD Caviar Black, R2007b:
30.65 seconds (avg of 3 runs)

So, there you have it, folks. I'm not trying to dissuade anyone from buying a Mini 10v, OTOH, I'm just saying what you're in for. It's a great little computer that can do 90% of the tasks most people do. If I get one, I'm still going to put MATLAB on it, but I just won't be doing any heavy lifting with it.

I ordered an Intel X-25M G2 80GB for my desktop the other day, but I might stick it in the GF's netbook and run a few benchmarks with it. It's like putting a Ferrari engine in a Ford Focus .


Sold my Mini 9 for a larger netbook, one that's easier on my wrists and hands.
Current Machine: 2010 MacBook Pro 13", 2.4 GHz C2D, 4GB RAM, Win7 Pro x64/OS X 10.6.3

And I play with my girlfriend's Mini 10v ^_^.

Interested in using MATLAB on the Mini 10v? Check out my benchmarks!
Reply With Quote
  (#2) Old
Super Moderator
 
holmes4's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,774
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New Hampshire
Default 02-21-2010, 12:31 PM

That's actually not too shabby, considering the N280 is single-core. You're absolutely correct, though - the Mini is not an ideal platform for scientific computing, but it can eventually get there in many applications.


Steve
Mini 9|2GB RAM|64GB RunCore|Intel 5300|Windows 8
Reply With Quote
  (#3) Old
Senior Member
 
w7ox's Avatar
 
Posts: 451
Join Date: Dec 2009
Default 02-21-2010, 01:43 PM

No big surprise. Number crunching is CPU intensive and the Atom CPU is not designed for "intense"

Phil


Netbook: Mini 10v, BIOS A05, OS X 10.6.4, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HDD, BT
Reply With Quote
  (#4) Old
Super Moderator
 
holmes4's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,774
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New Hampshire
Default 02-21-2010, 04:10 PM

In particular, the microarchitecture of the Atom is derived from the Pentium Pro. It supports SSE3 instructions but performance is low.


Steve
Mini 9|2GB RAM|64GB RunCore|Intel 5300|Windows 8
Reply With Quote
  (#5) Old
Senior Member
 
formerglory's Avatar
 
Posts: 115
Join Date: Feb 2009
Default 02-21-2010, 08:04 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by holmes4 View Post
In particular, the microarchitecture of the Atom is derived from the Pentium Pro. It supports SSE3 instructions but performance is low.
SSE3 is part of the special sauce that allows OS X to run decently on the 10v.

Gonna put up some more benchmarks in a bit, with the 'bench' command.


Sold my Mini 9 for a larger netbook, one that's easier on my wrists and hands.
Current Machine: 2010 MacBook Pro 13", 2.4 GHz C2D, 4GB RAM, Win7 Pro x64/OS X 10.6.3

And I play with my girlfriend's Mini 10v ^_^.

Interested in using MATLAB on the Mini 10v? Check out my benchmarks!
Reply With Quote
  (#6) Old
Member
 
Posts: 38
Join Date: May 2009
Default 02-22-2010, 05:06 AM

I missed this thread and I am glad to have found it. When you ran your benchmarks in Matlab, what fraction of the cpu is used by the program? When I have tried to run Mathematica code on the mini 10v and it only uses a few percent of the cpu according to activity monitor.
Reply With Quote
  (#7) Old
Senior Member
 
formerglory's Avatar
 
Posts: 115
Join Date: Feb 2009
Default 02-22-2010, 07:03 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by blehmann View Post
I missed this thread and I am glad to have found it. When you ran your benchmarks in Matlab, what fraction of the cpu is used by the program? When I have tried to run Mathematica code on the mini 10v and it only uses a few percent of the cpu according to activity monitor.
I'll check that out when I do my 'bench' runs and my own code runs. Should have them up tomorrow sometime after class.


Sold my Mini 9 for a larger netbook, one that's easier on my wrists and hands.
Current Machine: 2010 MacBook Pro 13", 2.4 GHz C2D, 4GB RAM, Win7 Pro x64/OS X 10.6.3

And I play with my girlfriend's Mini 10v ^_^.

Interested in using MATLAB on the Mini 10v? Check out my benchmarks!
Reply With Quote
  (#8) Old
Senior Member
 
formerglory's Avatar
 
Posts: 115
Join Date: Feb 2009
Default 02-23-2010, 02:00 AM

Alright folks, round two of benchmarks!

These measurements were taken using the built-in 'bench' command in MATLAB, with no other programs or non-essential processes running. I kept Microsoft Security Essentials running, and that's about it. Below are the printouts of each of the three computers I tested (Mini 10v, Acer 1410, Q9400 Core2 Quad desktop). Same specs as in the previous post.

Explanation of the tests, at MathWorks' site:
http://www.mathworks.com/access/help...ref/bench.html

Mini 10v:



Acer 1410:



Core 2 Quad Q9400 Desktop:



Just got my Intel X-25M G2 80GB drive today, and the GF has been ever so kind in allowing me to take over her machine for even more time to run some more benchmarks with the new SSD. It's going into my desktop ultimately, but I'm interested to see how much of a real-world difference a decent SSD makes, especially with MATLAB.

As for the processor & Task Manager, I didn't get to see it on the 10v, but I know on the 1410 and desktop the processor didn't spike up to 100% while running my GPS app and the bench command.

Questions or comments? Feel free to ask!


Sold my Mini 9 for a larger netbook, one that's easier on my wrists and hands.
Current Machine: 2010 MacBook Pro 13", 2.4 GHz C2D, 4GB RAM, Win7 Pro x64/OS X 10.6.3

And I play with my girlfriend's Mini 10v ^_^.

Interested in using MATLAB on the Mini 10v? Check out my benchmarks!
Reply With Quote
  (#9) Old
Junior Member
 
Posts: 3
Join Date: Feb 2010
Default Runs decently on short codes - 02-23-2010, 02:15 AM

I got my dell mini 10v about a week back ( yaa ) and have been using it for matlab coding since. My primary purpose was to be able to check mail in bed, but matlab runs moderatly fast on my XP machine. It does tend to get REALLY hot though (upto 70 C) when used for a three hour class duration.
Reply With Quote
  (#10) Old
Junior Member
 
Posts: 1
Join Date: Apr 2010
Default 04-01-2010, 09:17 PM

I'm also an engineering student. Been looking around for a light, portable netbook/non-DVD-ROM computer that can handle MATLAB and some Mathematica.

This post is much appreciated!

Any recommendations regarding 11z customization?
Reply With Quote
Reply

« Anyone's backspace key feel weird? | Anyone know a good site for 1024x576 resolution wallpapers? »
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Copyright © 2008-2011 MyDellMini.com.