My Dell Mini Forum

Corellian Corvette · **Different RAM speed for N280 vs. N270? -** 11-29-2009, 06:38 AM

Given the FSB speed difference between the N270 and the N280 (667 Mhz vs 533) Does that affect the speed of the RAM I should get? I should match the FSB speed, right?

dch · 11-29-2009, 02:39 PM

No, it makes no difference. Just get whatever is cheapest.

Discussion

Corellian Corvette · 11-29-2009, 07:18 PM

great article! Thanks!

yeewiz · 11-29-2009, 09:45 PM

cheapest is fine but actually your RAM should be at least the speed of your CPU

DVelasco68 · 11-29-2009, 10:18 PM

Actually I have the N280 (667MHz FSB), and 667MHz DDR2, but the Memory is only running @ 533MHz... The memory is:

CORSAIR VSA2GSDS667D2 2GB DDR2 SODIMM 200-Pin Notebook Memory Retail

Cas latency =5
Registered,
Unbuffered

Not sure why it would only run asynchronously at 533MHz on a 667MHz FSB?

Oh and I got this this past summer for $12 from ZipZoomFly (after $20 MIR)

Currently $34 after $20 MIR ( http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/Produc...43&prodlist=cj

bmcclure937 · 11-30-2009, 12:26 PM

I would stick to the N270 because the RAM will still run at 533MHz under both CPUs. Also, the added .06 GHz speed on the N280 is not worth the extra money (in my opinion).

DVelasco68 · 12-01-2009, 01:52 AM

Actually the 2.5 multiplier in the N280, alone is enough to justify the $25 extra dollars...

This compared to the 3.125 multiplier should save energy, and heat generation (although I could be wrong)

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmcclure937

I would stick to the N270 because the RAM will still run at 533MHz under both CPUs. Also, the added .06 GHz speed on the N280 is not worth the extra money (in my opinion).

dch · 12-02-2009, 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVelasco68

Not sure why it would only run asynchronously at 533MHz on a 667MHz FSB?

As discussed, this limitation is due to the intel chipset implementation.

gspears · 12-04-2009, 05:36 AM

I suppose it's purely subjective but I've got both cpus with faster memory in the 280 and it just feels faster than my 270 equipped machines. I put 2 gig upgrades in all, 533 in the 270s and 800 (got a good deal) in the 280s.

I have never taken the time to do any real tests but it seems like it takes the 270s longer to initially boot up and to load large programs.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Corellian Corvette Junior Member Posts: 13 Join Date: Nov 2009	Different RAM speed for N280 vs. N270? - 11-29-2009, 06:38 AM Given the FSB speed difference between the N270 and the N280 (667 Mhz vs 533) Does that affect the speed of the RAM I should get? I should match the FSB speed, right?

dch Senior Member Posts: 137 Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: USA	11-29-2009, 02:39 PM No, it makes no difference. Just get whatever is cheapest. Discussion

Corellian Corvette Junior Member Posts: 13 Join Date: Nov 2009	11-29-2009, 07:18 PM great article! Thanks!

yeewiz Member Posts: 71 Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: San Francisco	11-29-2009, 09:45 PM cheapest is fine but actually your RAM should be at least the speed of your CPU Bob Mini 1010 \| Windows 7 Home Premium clean install over factory installed XP \| 1GB RAM \| 160GB drive \| 1024x600 screen \| Bluetooth \| 1.3MP webcam \| 6-cell battery \| TV tuner

gspears Senior Member Posts: 156 Join Date: Jun 2009	12-04-2009, 05:36 AM I suppose it's purely subjective but I've got both cpus with faster memory in the 280 and it just feels faster than my 270 equipped machines. I put 2 gig upgrades in all, 533 in the 270s and 800 (got a good deal) in the 280s. I have never taken the time to do any real tests but it seems like it takes the 270s longer to initially boot up and to load large programs.

» Search Site
Advanced Search